1st year of marriage compared to 40 years
Ouch!
_______________________
Gerard Pierre LEVESQUE
Caveat
This is HUMOR … as in funny.
If this offends you … JUST SAY SO!
2009/10/01
2009/09/14
How Adam Got Eve...
Internet Explorer 8 makes surfing easier. Get it now!
Attention all humans. We are your photos. Free us. | ||||||||||||||
|
New! Open Hotmail faster on the new MSN homepage!
From: caron_francine@hotmail.com
Subject: FW: How Adam Got Eve...
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:24:00 -0300
Accédez plus rapidement à Hotmail grâce à le nouveau MSN.
2009/09/13
KCA NEWSLETTER - ADDENDUM
Dear KCA members, and Friends of Canada,
We had to bring a small change to the central part of the KCA Newsletter: the Poster and the Registration form.
Please use the NEW fax number (in this Addendum: 06 6319 1968) to reserve your place for the KCA Thanksgiving, on October 11.
The Registration Form comes as part of the PDF file and as a Word file (for those who prefer to type their reservation).
See you ALL at THANKS-GIVING,
Gerard Levesque
PS The OLD fax number (in the original Newsletter) will cease working in a few days.
<<...>> <<...>>
________________________
Gerard Pierre LEVESQUE
KCA Newsletter Editor
Phone: 075 467 0561
Portable: 080 7034 0561
Email: levesque@asahi.email.ne.jp
levesque.gerard@gmail.com
2009/09/12
The anti Political Correctness Counter-revolution has begun
‘Political correctness’
The Counter-revolution has begun
September 7, 2009 in exposing feminism
You do not have to go all the way in supporting the English Democrats party, whose silly proposal for an English parliament would add another superfluous layer to already excessive government, to raise a glass to Peter Davies, the party’s elected Mayor of Doncaster. Davies, the father of Tory MP Philip Davies, is one of just 11 directly elected mayors and he is enjoying increasing media exposure because of his outrageous agenda which, against all the tenets of consensual British politics, consists of doing what the public wants.
In his first week in office he cut his own salary from £73,000 to £30,000, which is putting one’s money where one’s mouth is. He also scrapped the mayoral limousine. He is ending Doncaster’s twinning with five towns around the world, an arrangement which he describes as “just for people to fly off and have a binge at the council’s expense”. He intends now to reduce (that’s right, reduce) council tax by 3 per cent this year.
The “diversity” portfolio has been abolished from the council’s cabinet.
From next year no more funding will be given to the town’s “Gay Pride” event, on the grounds that people do not need to parade their sexuality, whatever it may be, at taxpayers’ expense. Black History Month, International Women’s Day and the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender History Month are similarly destined to become history.
http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/
2009/07/22
An Open Letter to John Adams
Ohio State Rep John Adams has re-introduced legislation into the Ohio legislature that requires that the approval of a biological father must be obtained prior to a woman obtaining an abortion. There are exceptions of course which make sense, such as rape and incest and the life of mom. The bill also provides penalties for women who slay their fetus using a false or fictitious name.
This is big stuff that I foresee as having two major effects if passed.
One, it would drastically lower the rates of abortion, for it would require two to agree that the unborn child does not deserve the right to live. Given that men as a sex are much less enamored of feticide than are women, this would represent a huge number of lives saved.
Two, it would be a shift toward re-establish men's rights as rights worth respecting wrt reproduction. If it required the consent of two to make a life, it should require the consent of two to end one. Moreover, it would give men more of a legal stake in the life of their children, a stake that is denied them today by those who push for the woman to have absolute control over a child then blame men for not taking a more active interest in their child's well-being. It is time for children's issues to cease being a subset of women's issues and become society's concern.
While I strongly suspect that this legislation doesn't stand a snowball's chance of passing, as the abortionette lobby and others concerned with maintaining absolute female autonomy and minimal female accountability will be coming out full bore against it, I think it worthwhile to encourage the brave soul who introduced this legislation in the first place.
Here is my letter to Mr. Adams:
Hon. John Adams
77 S. High St
14th Floor
Columbus, OH
43215
Dear Sir,
While I am not an Ohio resident, having lived only a short time in the Dayton area before moving away to a better employment market, I wanted to express my sincerest thanks for your introduction of House Bill 252 into the Ohio State Legislature.
If one is deeply concerned about the holocaust of abortion in our country, as I am, then this bill would go a long way toward saving the lives of many thousands upon thousands of the most vulnerable Ohioans. For no other reason alone, sir, you are to be commended.
Moreover, if one is concerned about the lopsided state of reproductive rights in this country, as I am, then this bill also represents an important step toward re-investing the weakest link the American family--the father--in the fate and destiny of his children. This bill appears to restore a degree of autonomy and authority to the father with respect to the welfare of his future child(ren). This authority and autonomy will accompany his responsibilities in an equation where he presently has next to none of the former two and nearly all of the latter. As a man, a husband, and a father of three young men, I thank you again for your heroic efforts.
I am certain that you will probably receive many angry and opprobrious messages in opposition to this piece of legislation. I urge you to ignore them and hold fast to the principles that led you to not only introduce but re-introduce this legislation.
Thank you again for your bravery sir. Keep the faith and keep fighting the good fight. I wish there were more brave fellows out there such as yourself.
I see with this bill from an enforcement angle. What to do with the cases where the woman can't or won't attempt to identify the father? What to do with the Sally Sob Story that gets on the telly and bitches about how unfair the patriarchy is to her for not letting her kill her unborn child when she is an admitted slut and has no idea who the father is? I think it would take a lot of political will to exact punishment on such a women when holding women accountable for their actions is anathema in our culture.
If you have a couple alka-seltzers on hand and want some free funnery, cruise on over to Feministing and see how those fine specimens of the female species are handling this bill. Amusing reading there, I promise, particularly when the lone XY chromo shows up in the comments to troll a bit and ruffle some feathers. Some mild blue language, so be forewarned.
Rep Adams can be reached at the following contact information. Please take the time to write in support, for I'm certain the fembots are working themselves into a froth over this one.
Phone: (614) 466-1507
Fax: (614) 719-3978
Email: district78@ohr.state.oh.us
Serious hat tippage to Kim at Equal But Different.
Source: http://elusivewapiti.blogspot.com/
2009/06/16
Getting the message out is getting easier. Someone is listening.
Getting the message out is getting easier. Someone is listening.
An ideology that will not allow dissent is the first step to the imposition of totalitarianism, because, such an ideology has already subjected the minds of its adherents to the destruction of their own free thought. The only thing more important than free speech is free thought and free thought is rooted in free belief.
*******
I walk so I will remember what freedom looked like when they steal it and as I went for my customary stroll this evening I saw an astonishing sight. Standing on one corner, deep in conversation, were two men. Obviously this was a "testosterone fueled" discussion so I thought I had better give them a wide berth in case one or both of them produced a large automatic weapon and started killing everyone is sight. That's what "testosterone fueled" men do you know. Honest! A feminist told me so it must be true. I thought they just built things -- you know -- like civilisation, but apparently not.
On the other side of the street on another corner, a group of women were also standing together. They seemed very angry and were all stabbing an effigy of a male with a sign around his neck which read, "Real Man." I noticed that the effigy had two very large testicles and an average sized penis which one of the women was trying to cut off. However, no matter how much she hacked away she could not remove it. This seemed to infuriate the whole group and they began stabbing and screaming with ever greater fury. One of them had a T-Shirt on which bore the slogan, "Harriet's Angels." Beneath it was a patch that had the words; "We want equality so give us all the power now!" on it. This, was a feminist, oestrogen fueled, "discussion." I shuddered as I thought about the prospect of a whole cabinet made up of women like this and the nuclear button winking a red light invitingly, close by. Our entire stock of nuclear weaponry aimed at football stadiums around the country.
I left them to it and wandered onwards. It was not long before I came across a group of normal women. "Evening ladies." I said, as I approached them. "Hello love." One of them replied. We chatted about this and that for a while as we stood in the pleasant evening sunshine. As I bade them farewell one of them called after me.
"Have you seen Bob?"
I stopped and looked at her. "No. Not since yesterday. Why? Do you have to talk with him about something?"
She smiled. "No. I just wondered how he is. I haven't seen him for a week or so."
I returned her smile. "OK. If I see him I will tell him you asked after him. He was fine when I saw him yesterday."
"OK. George." She said, waving at me as I walked away.
Nice and normal. I made no attempt to oppress them and they did not hate me for being male. Not one of them mentioned a glass ceiling. Not one of them said I was part of the patriarchal conspiracy to keep them down. Consequently -- and you will not be surprised at this -- none of them had ever worked for the BBC or the Sun newspaper. Oddly, there was not a single lesbian among them either. All of these women (I have known them for years) either have kids now, or have had kids that have grown up and left home. Not one of them bore the marks where the mythical slave anklet had scarred their skin from being chained to the kitchen sink and all but one of the five was still married and a housewife. I was astounded at their normality.
OK. Concerning the women stabbing the effigy. I was exaggerating a little there. In fact, a lot. They were not really there but, women like this do exist and many of them are in the House of Commons and the BBC. A case for reform of both institutions if ever I saw one. The point is though, that these creatures really do think like this. They really do. Not all of them are women either. I just needed a contrast between the insane feminists and the normal women I know and love. Please excuse my poetic license.
Oh. In case you think I jest too much. Here is an actual quote from a feminist or three concerning men:
"It cannot therefore be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony or cohesion."
Anna Coote, Harriet Harman, & Patricia Hewitt. The Family Way
And just to show I am not biased, here is one from a patriarchal male of no consequence:
"The women's suffrage movement is only the small edge of the wedge, if we allow women to vote it will mean the loss of social structure and the rise of every liberal cause under the sun. Women are well represented by their fathers, brothers, and husbands."
Winston Churchill
Tsk! Men huh? Just shows how wrong he was!
Finally, here is one from a nice cuddly Russian who murdered a few million Estonian people by starving them to death and from whom, feminists get their ideas:
"Destroy the family and you destroy society "
Lenin
On the way home I called in to see a colleague and friend of mine. Also female. Married with two children and happy. I opened the back door and wandered into the kitchen. She was not there but I could hear her moving about upstairs so I called out.
"Hello oppressed one? It's only me. Your friendly neighbourhood oppressor and potential rapist."
"Make yourself a cuppa." She called and then added. "Make me one too, will you?"
I checked myself. Nope! Not a single urge to beat her to death for daring to ask ME, a superior man, to make HER, a mere woman, a cup of tea. Another feminist male stereotype bit the dust. As I poured the hot water into the cups she called down again.
"I have got something for you."
A joke was called for. I could not resist. "Does it come in see through nylon?" I yelled back.
Another voice called out. Male this time. "If it does. I want to see it first. It's been hiding for a week." It was Trev. Her husband.
Just then there was a loud thump.
"Did she just hit you?" I yelled. I heard his wife laugh.
"No. It's OK." Trev shouted. "I just dropped a roll of carpet"
"Want a cuppa, Trev?" I called.
"Nah. Got one thanks." He replied.
Just a normal, everyday banter filled conversation between long time friends. Both of which vote.
In the world of the loony PC infected morons that escaped from the nuthouse years ago and joined the Labour Party, the Sun's editorial staff, the BBC, turned to feminism or became David Cameron's nanny, this conversation should have been banned years ago. The thought police hate stuff like this; but then, they would, this is normal life and they are nutters.
As I waited for them to come down, I sat on the back door step enjoying the evening sounds around me and smoking a cigarette. Another taboo, beloved of Marxists and Fascists (This conglomeration is known as, "The Third Way.") in the health service and government. As I dragged on my fag, I pondered that if global warming is real -- and not just a way for business to get richer and government to impose carbon taxes on us once we have all been made to feel guilty enough -- I might grow my own tobacco in the garden.
As I thought of this, I had a vision of armed police smashing in the front door (they don't learn about doorbells in police training camps) and bursting through the house and into the garden. There they forced me to lie down and practiced their, "resisting arrest restraint techniques" on me for five minutes or so and then, when I had regained consciousness, they told me my rights -- none -- and explained in the kindly way the British Bobby is famous for all over the tourist postcards, that I was, "F****** nicked under E.U. directive 1,245000,368.3 section 4h subsection 83m/b for being in possession, with intent to enjoy, a banned substance. Namely, tobacco." I was then warned that anything I did not say would be made up and used in evidence against me and hauled before an unbiased Magistrate. Once there, I was sentenced to death by shooting for daring to place the National Health budget at risk, before I had time to say, "not guilty your PC-ness," to the judge.
The two reprobates I call friends arrived and as his wife drank her tea and chatted to me, Trev went off to find the DVD he wanted me to look at. After a while his shout of, "found it!" was the cue for us to file into the living room to watch it. Like a good subservient female dominated by the men around her and cowed by that domination, Trev's misses led the way and I trotted on behind.
In the living room I watched the DVD and then Trev got on his computer, copied off the segments I wanted and handed me the results. I thanked him. We all smoked a fag and then I left. All the way home I mercilessly beat myself with an invisible club for not washing the cups up, doing the housework and digging the garden before I left the poor helpless female in the company of her repressive patriarchal monster of a husband.
At home I watched the segment and uploaded it to a file sharing site so others around the world could see it and store it. Another bit added to the pile of evidence to be used later.
So ends another day in my humdrum life of trying to educate people about feminism, with some success, I might add. Of course I have my failures. Lots of journalists and BBC staff are too brainwashed to think for themselves and most of the political world is even worse -- but not all of them. A few know what I am saying is right and some of those have got testicles big enough to fight back. Among the women I know there is a great new awareness growing up about just how conned they have been by feminists. One lady -- I shall call her Pat -- actually spat on the floor when I mentioned feminism to her and she said, "We should give them their own island and a lifetime supply of dildo's and leave them to it." She takes great exception to having her sons and daughter described in terms like this:
"Heterosexuality is a die-hard custom through which male-supremacist institutions insure their own perpetuity and control over us.
Women are kept, maintained and contained through terror, violence, and the spray of semen...
[Lesbianism is] an ideological, political and philosophical means of liberation of all women from heterosexual tyranny..."
Cheryl Clarke, "Lesbianism, An Act of Resistance," in This Bridge Called My Back: Writing by Radical Women of Color, ed. Cherrie Moraga (Women of Color Press,1983), pp.128-137.
Before I go, I want just to say that quite a few feminists got their knickers all bunched up because I said recently that business had conspired with feminists to drive women out of their homes in the late 50's and early 60's and beyond, by selling them the lie that if they went to work they would be free. To do this of course, it was necessary to back up the feminist idea that men treated women badly as a matter of routine and so they started to wind up women by making highly offensive adverts and putting them out on radio and TV. Giving the impression that all men thought as they were portrayed in the Ads. The amount of hate mail I got from the "sisters" was quite staggering, even for me. I love it when that happens. It means I have struck a nerve they would rather I did not talk about. Now, where did the idea come from that women were better off abandoning their families and young children and going off to slave away in factories and shops alongside the men, thus undermining one of the principle foundations of western civilisation, the family unit?
Here is a clue. He was a Marxist.
No?
OK. Here you go....
"The first condition of the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society."
Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State (1942) p.67
Has the penny dropped yet? Through business greed and Marxist infiltration, our society with its freedoms, its beloved institutions, its security and its history is slowly being taken over by Communism. Step by step. One of those steps is the stealing of children to be brought up by the State (Also known as "Village" politics) and that means removing their fathers.
"The care of children ..is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation...[This] would further undermine family structure while contributing to the freedom of women."
Kate Millet, Sexual Politics 178-179
Remember this?
"It cannot therefore be assumed that men are bound to be an asset to family life or that the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony or cohesion"
Anna Coote, Harriet Harman, & Patricia Hewitt. The Family Way
Welcome to the revolution you did not see coming because it has taken 50 years to get here. Step by stealthy step. Coincidently, political correctness has its origins in something called the Frankfurt School. Look them up on the Internet. Guess who they were.
Yep!
Marxists.
Guess what the aim of PC is.
Yep!
The destabilising of western society.
So! Next time you hear about children being forcibly taken away from perfectly good parents because they are "too stupid." Or, kids stabbing each other. Or, Muslims being let into the country in droves and then rampaging on the streets calling for the deaths of people they do not like. Or family courts removing all contact with children from their fathers. Just think about why it is all happening and then picture Harriet Harman as prime minister.
Getting it now?
I will leave you with this quote. As you read it, think about how the meaning of once innocent words are being changed in PC Britain. If you want your country back, YOU have to take it back and you cannot trust any politician currently in government or opposition to give it back. That means you have to vote them out or force them out by the courts and the use of common law and you have to take their place. What you are watching is treason taking place and YOU are the target of it. They are taking you for a fool and stealing your freedom, your families and your children while they do it.
"All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be extended in this direction. ...
The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan....
The function of propaganda is, for example, not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly."
Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter VI
And you thought feminism was a noble thing dedicated to giving women "equality" didn't you?
Study it and wake up! Think for yourself. They HATE that!
George Rolph
London
June 14th 09
2009/06/15
DÉJÀ 63 000 LIENS
OFFEND A FEMINIST WEEK!
DEJA 63 000 LIENS
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=national+offend+feminist+week
I ENJOY BEING A GIRL!
The official song of "OFFEND A FEMINIST WEEK"
I ENJOY BEING A GIRL!
I'm a girl, and by me that's only great!
I am proud that my silhouette is curvy,
That I walk with a sweet and girlish gait
With my hips kind of swivelly and swervy.
I adore being dressed in something frilly
When my date comes to get me at my place.
Out I go with my Joe or John or Billy,
Like a filly who is ready for the race!
When I have a brand new hairdo
With my eyelashes all in curl,
I float as the clouds on air do,
I enjoy being a girl!
When men say I'm cute and funny
And my teeth aren't teeth, but pearl,
I just lap it up like honey
I enjoy being a girl!
I flip when a fellow sends me flowers,
I drool over dresses made of lace,
I talk on the telephone for hours
With a pound and a half of cream upon my face!
I'm strictly a female female
And my future I hope will be
In the home of a brave and free male
Who'll enjoy being a guy having a girl... like... me.
When men say I'm sweet as candy
As around in a dance we whirl,
It goes to my head like brandy,
I enjoy being a girl!
When someone with eyes that smoulder
Says he loves ev'ry silken curl
That falls on my iv'ry shoulder,
I enjoy being a girl!
When I hear the compliment'ry whistle
That greets my bikini by the sea,
I turn and I glower and I bristle,
But I happy to know the whistle's meant for me!
I'm strictly a female female
And my future I hope will be
In the home of a brave and free male
Who'll enjoy being a guy having a girl... like... me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjWn-ueeeLw&feature=player_embedded
National Offend a Feminist Week
National Offend a Feminist Week
http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/05/national-offend-feminist-week.html
2009/06/13
$50 For the Homeless
$50 For the Homeless
I recently asked my friend's little girl what she wanted to be when she grows up.
She said she wanted to be Prime Minister some day.
Both of her parents, left wing-progressives, were standing there, so I asked her, "If you were Prime Minister what would be the first thing you would do?"
She replied, "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."
Her socialist parents beamed.
"Wow... what a worthy goal." I told her, "But you don't have to wait until you're president to do that. You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I'll pay you $50. Then I'll take you over to the grocery store where homeless guys hang out, and you can give them the $50, you earned, to use toward food and a new house."
She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?"
I said, "Welcome to the Conservative Party."
Her parents still aren't speaking to me.
2009/06/08
Journaliste imbecile
Why men earn more than women
(WRONG! WOMEN EARN MORE THAN MEN THROUGH ANTI-MALE RE-ACTIONARY DISCRIMINATION)
For decades, we in the media have HAVE BEEN PROPAGATING THE FEMINIST LIE THAT women earn less than men.
As a result, FEMINISM AND THE MEDIA HAVE created a generation of angry AND DELUDED women and self-conscious AND COWERING men.
A new book, "Why Men Earn More," by Dr. Warren Farrell, shows we've been dead wrong: For the same work, women earn more than men
BECAUSE THE WOMEN PROFIT FORM ANTI-MALE "POSITIVE" (SIC) DISCRIMINATION.
His findings are based on a comprehensive review of government and other statistics.
Farrell is no right-wing misogynist. He ran for the Democratic nomination for California governor. He's the only man ever elected three times to the board of the National Organization for Women in New York City. And he's no intellectual lightweight; the Financial Times named him one of the world's top 100 thought leaders.
The book's main message is good news for women
AND BAD NEWS FOR FEMINIST WOMEN.
If women do one or more of the 25 things men more often do, women can earn more than men
(THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT. THEY ARE ALREADY EARNING MORE THROUGH AFFIRMATIVE RE-ACTION).
Farrell does not encourage nor discourage women from doing these 25 things:
"Each of the 25 usually requires trading quality of life for money. I just want women and men to be aware of their options so they can craft a life rather than just accept what drops in their lap."
The 25 can be reduced to three:
1. Choose careers that pay more.
(THIS GUY IS A FOOL: NOT ONLY DO WOMEN EARN MORE; THEY WORK LESS, IN MORE PLEASANT AND SECURE ENVIRONMENT: I.E. IN OFFICES AND FOR THE GOVERNMENT)
Because of supply and demand, you'll earn more by choosing a job that:
is in an unpleasant environment (prison vs. childcare facility);
requires harder-to-attain skills (hard science vs. liberal arts); TOUGH LUCK ON THIS ONE: MEN HAVE SUPERIOR THREE DIMENSIONAL BRAINS.
requires longer work hours (executive vs. administrative assistant);
is unrewarding to most people (tax accountant vs. artist);
demands financial risk (commission-based sales vs. government job); HA! HA! HA! RISK AVOIDANCE, THY NAME IS ... WOMAN!
is inconvenient (traveling salesperson vs. teacher);
is hazardous (police officer vs. librarian). HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!)
EVEN IN HAZARDOUS JOBS (POLICE WOMEN, FEMALE FIRE-FIGHTERS, GIRL SOLDIERETTES ...) THEY ARE LESS HURT THAN MEN: I.E. MEN CARRY, ON AVERAGE, A GREATER RISK OF INJURY AND DEATH SINCE THE ARRIVAL OF WOMEN IN THESE JOBS.
FEMINISM KILLS ... MEN ... EVERYDAY!
Many more men than women are willing to accept such jobs, even when women are paid more. For example, women sales engineers earn 143 percent of their male counterparts' salaries (TALK ABOUT SEXIST DISCRIMINATION), yet less than 20 percent of sales engineers are women.
2. Put in more hours. That's obvious, but key. For example, Farrell cites research that "Fortune 1000 CEOs typically paid their dues with 60- to 90-hour workweeks for about 20 years. Yet women are less than half as likely as men to work more than 50 hours a week. And women are less likely to agree, every few years, to uproot themselves and their families to far-flung places to get the necessary promotions."
(I.E. DO FEMALE CEO'S GET THERE FROM AFFIRMATIVE RE-ACTION?)
Why? Because women, on average, are more involved in childrearing and other domestic activities. So, if a woman (or man) expects to rise to high-paying jobs, she may need to push harder to get hubby more involved in those activities, pay for childcare and domestic services, or decide not to have children (CAREER WOMEN TEND TO DIE CHILDLESS ... BOY, ARE THESE CAREERS CHICKS ... IDIOTS!) .
I asked Farrell, "But shouldn't workplaces not expect a woman (or a man) to work so many hours that family life is undercut?" He responded, "Yes, absolutely, but we must be gender-fair. If a male corporate manager chose to take care of his children, we'd applaud him but not expect the workplace to promote him as quickly. Yet when women do the same, women's advocacy (I.E. FEMI NAZI) organizations often expect (NO! DEMAND AND GET) just that. Both men and women must accept the consequences of their choices."
3. Be more productive in the hours you do work. If women produce as much as men, the good news is they will likely be rewarded. For example, women's advocacy organizations (FEMI SEXIST) complain that female professors earn less than male professors, but Farrell cites research that among professors who produce an equal number of journal articles, "men were likely to be paid the same or just slightly less than women."
I asked Farrell, "But apart from the 25 nonsexist reasons men earn more, isn't sexism still a factor?" He responded, "There are instances of discrimination against both women and men, but on average, no. If you knew you could hire a woman for less than an equivalent man, you'd hire women to get a price advantage over your competition. Do you think businesses so hate women that they hire more expensive men even though they'd lose so much money?"
(BUSINESSES HAVE TO HIRE WOMEN TO AVOID THE FEMINIST-DOMINATED GOVERNMENT RUINING THEM THROUGH FEMI-SEXIST LAWS AND ENDLESS COURT ACTIONS.
In reflecting on Farrell's book, I wonder if, rather than denigrating men for earning more, we should respect them for their willingness to do unpleasant, but necessary, work that few women will do such as roofing, coal mining or guarding a prison -- often working themselves into an early grave. There are four widows for every widower. (AND WOMEN WILL CHANGE THAT? HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!)
And men, you might learn a lesson from women and consider trading money for quality of life.
THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN!
IT WOULD REQUIRE WOMEN TO STOP BEING FEMALES: I.E. HYPERGAMOUS: MARRYING A MALE OF HIGHER STATUS THAN THEMSELVES (SOMEONE WHO CAN PROVIDE FOR THEM AND "THEIR" CHILDREN.
WHY WOULD WOMEN PUT AN END TO THEIR GRAVY TRAIN?
WOMEN WILL NOT MARY DOWN!
IT IS MEN WHO HAVE TO CHANGE: TAKING BACK CONTROL OVER OUR OWN PRO-CREATION:
OUR BODIES, OUR SELVES = OUR WORK, OUR PAYCHECK, OUR WEALTH.
AND THEN AND ONLY THEN NEGOTIATE A NEW AND BINDING MARRIAGE CONTRACT!
Article original: http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/career/20050307a1.asp
Gerard Levesque
| Gérard Pierre LEVESQUE "Delenda est Feminisma" Mail : levesque.gerard@gmail.com Voir: http://levesquegerardpierre.blogspot.com/ http://www.rulymob.com/french/index.htm |
|
Lay judge system starts amid doubts
TITLE Lay judge system starts amid doubts Topic Many people have expressed reluctance toward serving as citizen judges. The lay judge system has started last Thursday, and the justice minister has already said that modifications may be needed to win understanding from ordinary people. Under the system, six citizen judges are supposed to be involved in trials of serious crimes, such as murder and inflicting injuries resulting in death. The lay judges will not only help in deciding the verdict, but they will also be involved in the sentencing. But many people have expressed reluctance toward serving as citizen judges because they might have to inflict the death penalty on someone. Serving as a lay judge might be tough for ordinary people. They would have to be absent from their jobs. And they might have to watch gruesome pictures of crime scenes. I can understand the ordinary people's feelings. But it might be a good opportunity to understand the trial system. If I'm assigned as a lay judge, I'd take it positively. 1 - lay judge system 裁判員制度 2 – inflicting injury 過失致死 3 – 4 – 5 - 6 - 7 – 8 – 9 – 10 – 11 – 12 – Discussion Questions (or related statements, or topics for discussion) 1 - What do you think about the lay judge system? 2 - Do you want be assigned for lay judge duties? 3 - Could you demand a severe penalty for an accused found guilty of a serious crime? Source: http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200905220075.html
Summary
Impressions and Opinions
New Words
Inscription à :
Messages (Atom)
