Feminism in its essence a liberal-capitalist revolution

According to his version of history Western Christian feudalism was best
able to repress the sexuality of the alpha male and his female customers.

Unlike the Muslims or Orientals there were no harems of females for Alpha
males. Instead there was a forced monogamy imposed on both females and alpha
males. The triumph of the beta male and his K strategy of investing in
offspring lead to the hegemony of the West. This is similar to Freud's
thesis that civilizations progress was based on the Superego's ability to
harness and control the Id.

Those disenfranchised elements of Western society were slowly integrated
into the "reverse dominance hierarchy". The last step was the integration of
females and then the beta utopia, the Ayn Randist dystopia. But according to
Roissy that was the Pandora box that unleashed the repressed Id of the alpha
male and females. And so like a Phoenix, the grey-back Gorilla was reborn
from the ashes.

Feminism in its essence a liberal-capitalist revolution. Like the English,
Dutch, American, French, 1848, revolutions it is about establishing market
contractual relations, where tradition and domination had once ruled. Now
all those revolutions have been blurred to the extent that some people
consider them anti-liberal democratic.

And it is true in all those revolutions radicals, Levelers, Seadogs, Whiskey
Rebellions, and Jacobins emerged that wanted to take the revolution beyond
the liberal market.

This is the role that the Radical Feminists of Catherine McKinnon and Andrea
Dworkin played in the feminist revolution. The feminist porn wars were their
Whiskey Rebellion against the liberals.

The libertarian feminists grew worried about the monster they had unleashed
and were willing to join forces with Hugh Hefner against the more dangerous
threat to their left. To use Murray Rothbard's left-right spectrum from
Prospects for Liberty.

The libertarian sex positive feminists were the REAL left. They were the
ones who opposed the traditional patriarchal structure of the Right. In
Rothbard's terms the radical feminists who are conventionally considered
extreme left, would actually be a confused centrist middle of the road
position that attempted to accomplish liberal ends using conservative ends.
They themselves recognized it to the extent that they allied themselves with
the Religious Right in the Porn Wars.

With the defeat of the Radicals in the Porn Wars, the libertine capitalist
free-market was established in sexual relations. According to Roissy this
has benefited Alpha males the most. There is a tacit libertarian feminist/
alpha male alliance against BOTH beta males AND the possible revived corpse
of radical feminism.

Minus a couple of quibbles, this is a pretty good stab at a philosophical
strain of Roissyanism. Feminism is, in essence, an alliance of convenience
between women and alpha males.

Women get to play the field longer and more hypergamously, and alpha males
get access to more free premarital pussy. (Not that I'm complaining!)

Beta males get the short end of the stick.

Arguably, beta females also suffer a degradation in their market value -
while pump and dumps with men normally out of their league temporarily
validate their egos and inflate their self-worth, their psyches eventually
wither under the continual churn of their pussies riding the cock carousel,
an amusement ride which never slows down to give them the love most women
deeply crave. So beta females suffer a double hit: once, to their feminine
integrity, and again to their value on the open market where sluts are
justifiably less valued as long term partners by men.

http://roissy.wordpress.com <http://roissy.wordpress.com/> /